<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>therning.org/ magnus &#187; don stewart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therning.org/magnus/archives/tag/don-stewart/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therning.org/magnus</link>
	<description>Incoherent mumblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Randal Schwartz on why dynamic beat static&#8212;a rather rubbish talk</title>
		<link>http://therning.org/magnus/archives/620</link>
		<comments>http://therning.org/magnus/archives/620#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floss weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[randal schwartz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therning.org/magnus/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, not the most diplomatic title maybe, but listening to Randal Schwartz&#8217; talk &#8220;Dynamic Returns&#8221; first made me laugh and then made my fingers itch to write him an email addressing the fallacies he is peddling. Anyway, I wrote this large, rather ranting, blog post but then decided to not publish iti. Randal, my suggestion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not the most diplomatic title maybe, but listening to <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/SingleView.ssp?showComments=true&amp;entry=3419405760">Randal Schwartz&#8217; talk &#8220;Dynamic Returns&#8221;</a> first made me laugh and then made my fingers itch to write him an email addressing the fallacies he is peddling.  Anyway, I wrote this large, rather ranting, blog post but then decided to not publish it<sup><a href="http://therning.org/magnus/archives/620#footnote_0_620" id="identifier_0_620" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Randal, if you read this I&amp;#8217;ll be happy to send the draft version of the post to you, just drop me an email   ">i</a></sup>.</p>

<p>Randal, my suggestion to you is that you get someone like Don Stewart on FLOSS Weekly (I believe he is based in Portland as well) to discuss how Haskell&#8217;s advanced type system can be harnessed to completely remove whole classes of bugs.</p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_620" class="footnote">Randal, if you read this I&#8217;ll be happy to send the draft version of the post to you, just drop me an email <img src='http://therning.org/magnus/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </li></ol><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftherning.org%2Fmagnus%2Farchives%2F620&amp;title=Randal%20Schwartz%20on%20why%20dynamic%20beat%20static%E2%80%94a%20rather%20rubbish%20talk" id="wpa2a_2">Share/Bookmark</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therning.org/magnus/archives/620/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

