A no-no in my book (found in Cabal)

A recent “find” in Cabal made me think of this:

In my opinion the final decision of what to do in case of an error belongs in the appliation, not in libraries.

I’m sure there are exceptions to this, but I believe it’s good as a guiding principle when defining APIs.

Here’s the code in Cabal that breaks this rule. Basically, if you write an application and call readPackageDescription on a cabal file with errors then your application is terminated (the call to dieWithLocation ends up calling exitWith). I would much rather it returned an error (e.g. based on Either) so I can decide what to do with bad cabal files myself.

I’ve raised a ticket for it of course ;-)



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>