Comments on: Epilicious 0.11

By: Magnus

Magnus — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:10:24 +0000

rodgersan, as the "Bugzilla tip" says:

UNCONFIRMED means that this bug has yet to be triaged, but still may have been seen and/or actively worked on by the developer. Due to the high amount of bugs filed every day it may take a while before someone triages this bug.

In short, it'll be confirmed as soon as I get around to reproduce it.

By: rodgersan

rodgersan — Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:11:58 +0000

I did a bug report but it’s always unconfirmed, maybe did I something wrong?

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424935

By: Magnus

Magnus — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:01:40 +0000

Yes, there is a section for epilicious, you'll find it under epiphany-extensions.

By: rodgersan

rodgersan — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:18:25 +0000

To make it working again, I must delete the older epilicious (epilicious_old) file in my /.gnome2/epiphany folder.

I hope it will help you to track that bug

Regards

By: rodgersan

rodgersan — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:55:35 +0000

I'm a little new to these bug reports, so I ask you before I register at gnome.bugzilla.org. Could you tell me where I must report the bug? Is there a specific section for epilicious?

By: Magnus

Magnus — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:11:28 +0000

rodgersan,

Thanks. Would it be possible for you to raise this as a bug in GNOME's Bugzilla instead? It would make it a lot easier for me to track that way.

By: rodgersan

rodgersan — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:20:08 +0000

Hello, I found a bug (I presume it is)

I can reproduce it:

Configure epilicious with login, password and a tag that I will named: test Now synchronize your bookmarks. Change the tag name: test2 Synchronize again and the process will fail.

I tried some kinds of configuration:

Deleting all the bookmarks in epiphany and using a tag with a compound name (hum)

I also tested again with a tag "test" and it was working.

I'm using a patched epiphany from the gnome 2.16.1 release and epilicious 0.11