<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M$ Vista security, &#8220;integrity control&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therning.org/magnus/archives/259/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therning.org/magnus/archives/259</link>
	<description>Incoherent mumblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB&#8217;s Windows Security &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why doesn&#8217;t IE7 protected mode mark downloaded files as low integrity?</title>
		<link>http://therning.org/magnus/archives/259/comment-page-1#comment-17959</link>
		<dc:creator>MB&#8217;s Windows Security &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why doesn&#8217;t IE7 protected mode mark downloaded files as low integrity?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therning.org/magnus/archives/259#comment-17959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] using tools like chml and looking closer at MIC, some people started noticing that when they download a file from IE7 (or other low-integrity processes), [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using tools like chml and looking closer at MIC, some people started noticing that when they download a file from IE7 (or other low-integrity processes), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
